Sorry.
You are not permitted to access the full text of articles.
If you have any questions about permissions,
please contact the Society.
์ฃ์กํฉ๋๋ค.
ํ์๋์ ๋ ผ๋ฌธ ์ด์ฉ ๊ถํ์ด ์์ต๋๋ค.
๊ถํ ๊ด๋ จ ๋ฌธ์๋ ํํ๋ก ๋ถํ ๋๋ฆฝ๋๋ค.
[ Article ] | |
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 445-466 | |
Abbreviation: SJE | |
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print) | |
Print publication date 30 Nov 2009 | |
Received 27 Feb 2009 Revised 24 Oct 2009 | |
China’s Horizontal University-Industry Linkage: Where From and Where To | |
Jong-Hak Eun
| |
Assistant Professor, Chinese Studies Major, School of International & Area Studies, Kookmin University, 861-1, Jeongneung-Dong, Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul 136-702, Korea, Tel: +82-2-910-4441, Fax: +82-2-910-4429 (jheun@kookmin.ac.kr) | |
Funding Information ▼ | |
JEL Classification: I23, O43, O53 |
This study aims to explore the emerging horizontal universityindustry linkage (UIL) in China, which is hardly addressed in existing literature. For that purpose, we conducted two separate but closely related questionnaire surveys: one for university professors in China, and another for firms. From the surveys, we determined that horizontal UIL is now replacing the traditional mode of knowledge industrialization in China. We also discovered that the current horizontal UIL in China is heavily dependent on “formal contracts.” According to our preliminary econometric analyses, the characteristic Chinese preference towards formal contractbased UIL could be explained by the lack of “institutional thickness” in China. This implies that China should utilize more varied channels of horizontal UIL, including informal and open science channels, as the institution becomes more sophisticated. Currently, most Chinese firms appear to be very positive in evaluating their own experiences of collaboration with universities. However, we have also confirmed that promoting direct and formal UIL is not without social costs (e.g., damaging university education), which policy makers should carefully consider.
Keywords: University-industry linkage (UIL), Questionnaire, China |
This study was financially supported by the International Development Research Center (IDRC). The author would like to express his gratitude to professors Guisheng Wu and Yi Wang at Tsinghua University for their support of the surveys conducted in China. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the International Conference on Chinese Universities in Transition and Asian Experiences, hosted by the CHINDIA Research Institute of Kookmin University.
1. | Amin, A., and Thrift, N. “Globalisation, Institutional Thickness, and the Local Economy.” In P. Healey, S. Cameron, S. Davoudi, S. Graham, and A. Madani-Pour (eds.), Managing Cities: The New Urban Context. Chichester: John Wiley, pp. 92-108, 1995. |
2. | Bekkers, R., and Bodas Freitas, I. M. “Analysing Knowledge Transfer Channels between Universities and Industry: To What Degree Do Sectors also Matter?” Research Policy 37 (No. 10 2008): 1837-53. |
3. | Branscomb, L. M., Kodama, F., and Florida, R. (eds.). Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1999. |
4. | Cohen, W. M., and Levinthal, D. A. “Absorptive capacity: A New Perspectiveon Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (No. 1 1990): 128-52. |
5. | Cohen, W., Nelson, R., and Walsh, J. “Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D.” Management Science 48(No. 1 2002): 1-23. |
6. | Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., and Healey, P. Capitalizing Knowledge: NewIntersections of Industry and Academia. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998. |
7. | Eun, J.-H. “Fading Away University-run Enterprises: The Evolution of the Chinese National Innovation System.” Sino-Soviet Affairs 33 (No.1 2009): 93-120 (in Korean). |
8. | Eun, J.-H., and Lee, K. “An Empirical Inquiry into Academy-run Enterprises in China: Unique Characteristics and Evolutionary Changes.” International Journal of Innovation Management, Forthcoming. |
9. | Eun, J.-H., Lee, K., and Wu, G. “Explaining the University-run enterprises in China: A Theoretical Framework for University-Industry Relationship in Developing Countries and Its Application to China.” Research Policy 35 (No. 9 2006): 1329-46. |
10. | Eun, J.-H., Wu, G., and Wang, Y. “The Horizontal Academia-Industry Linkage in China.” In Lee, K. et al.(eds.), Promoting Effective Modes of University-Industry Interaction and their Evolution for Economic Catch-up in Asia, Chapter 3, Unpublished Technical Report for the IDRC Research on Knowledge Systems (RoKS),2009. |
11. | Evans, R., and Harding, A. “Regionalisation, Regional Institutions and Economic Development.” Policy and Politics 25 (No. 1 1997): 19-30. |
12. | Freeman, C. Japan: A New National System of Innovation? London: Pinter, 1987. |
13. | Giuliani, E., and Arza, V. “What Drives the Formation of ‘Valuable’ University-Industry Linkages?: Insights from the Wine Industry.” Research Policy 38 (No. 6 2009): 906-21. |
14. | Kroll, H., and Liefner, I. “Spin-off Enterprises as a Means of Technology Commercialization in a Transforming Economy – Evidence from Three Universities in China.” Technovation 28 (No. 5 2008): 298-313. |
15. | Lin, J. Y., and Tsai, Y. “Reform and Development in China: A New Institutional Economics Perspective” Seoul Journal of Economics17 (No. 3 2004): 335-81. |
16. | Lundvall, B. A. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory ofInnovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter, 1992. |
17. | Lundvall, B. A. “The University and the Learning Economy.” Unpublished Manuscript, 2004. |
18. | Mansfield, E. “Academic Research and Industrial Innovation.” Research Policy 20 (No. 1 1991): 1-12. |
19. | Mansfield, E. “Academic Research and Industrial Innovation: An Update of Empirical Findings.” Research Policy 26 (Nos. 7-8 1998): 773-6. |
20. | Monjon, S., and Waelbroeck, P. “Assessing Spillovers from Universities to Firms: Evidence from French Firm-level Data.” InternationalJournal of Industrial Organization 21 (No. 9 2003): 1255-70. |
21. | Nelson, R. (ed.). National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. |
22. | Poyago-Theotoky, J., Beath, J., and Siegel, D. S. “Universities and Fundamental Research: Reflections on the Growth of University-Industry Partnerships.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18(No. 1 2002): 10-21. |
23. | Salter, A. J., and Martin, B. R. “The Economic Benefits of Publicly Funded Research: A Critical Review.” Research Policy 30 (No. 32001): 509-39. |
24. | Swann, G. M. P. Innovative Businesses and the Science and Technology Base: An Analysis Using CIS3 Data. Report for the Department of Trade and Industry, London: DTI, 2002. |
Editorial Office, Seoul Journal of Economics, Institute of Economic Research, Seoul National University 599 Gwanangno, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-746, Korea
Tel: +82-2-880-5434 | Fax: +82-2-888-4454 | E-mail: sje@plaza.snu.ac.kr
Copyright (c) 2020 SJE. All rights reserved.